Sections 107, 145, 150, 151 and 561 The accuracy of the magistrate's attachment to the property through the police report was that the competing parties were co-sharers of the disputed property and were living in it, and without commitment. Damaging the person and the property magistrate. The question is whether or not there is an emergency, the attachment order has been approved and the persons arrested under Sections 107, 150 and 151 have been extended on bail, neither the CCC nor the property in such a police report. Did not talk about an emergency to attach, nor did the magistrate make any inquiry before passing an attached order. The property would be immovable, if there was a pending case between the parties competing in the civil court under an approved sanction at the time of the attachment by the magistrate to the disputed property, which was interim under section 145, CR PC The order was issued forbidden. Unable to retain, when the matter for possession of the disputed property was already administered by the civil court company, section 45, the enforcement of the proceedings under CRPC would be unnecessary because such a civil lawsuit would result in peace. The possibility of violation would be denied when the magistrate extended the arrested High Court on bail, dismissing the improper order in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
