MUHAMMAD YOUSAF CHOUDHRY versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU
R4 (1) (b) (ii) an employee employed as a Deputy Counsel in sections 3 (1) (f) and 5 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servant Service (Special Powers) Act, 2001 Mandatory retirement was essentially retired from the job, without notice to the job and without any inquiry against it, retirement was essentially a punishment, which according to the law could not be imposed on the employees. Mandatory retirement punishment can only be imposed by the authority, which can be asked only after inquiry by a committee constituted under Section 5 of the Independent Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servant Removal from the Service (Special Powers) Act 2001, whether the employee. Will the retirement happen on a specific date? , Or he was sentenced to life imprisonment, had no clue as to why it was a separate matter, a mandatory retirement decision approved by the authority, and a decision by the service tribunal that dismissed the employee's appeal, Was separated, the employee will be considered to be reinstated to the job
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013
