Find a Lawyer

MST. SARDAR BEGUM versus REHMAT KHAN

Section & Pre 20 Pre-Disciplinary Suit Based on the gift covenant, the sale of the suit in the suit land, the promotion of the status of the suit, cannot be obtained on the basis of such improvement, which Islam acknowledges. And will not affect the legal right of pre-emption to be placed in the pre-emptor under the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Preferred Purchase Act, 1993. Such improvement is subject to section 20A of the applicable law. Was prevented by, thus, the suit will not affect the pre-emptor's right to the suit. The principles were decided in the rules

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2013

• FAZAL DAD v. ADNAN ALI 2013 CLC 754
• WAJID MUNIR v. MIRPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MIRPUR 2013 PLC(CS) 755
• Prof. Engineer NAIB HUSSAIN v. Engineer Prof. Dr. MUHAMMAD RIAZ MUGHAL 2013 PLC(CS) 816
• NAILA BASHIR v. Syeda ZANIB-UN-NISA 2013 PLC(CS) 831
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF CHOUDHRY v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU 2013 PLC(CS) 844
• Mst. MEHR NISHAN v. NIAZ MUHAMMAD 2013 YLR 871
• MUHAMMAD NAZIR v. ABDUL MANNAN 2013 CLC 910
• NAZAR KHAN v. Mst. HASSAN BEGUM 2013 MLD 913

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2013 →

ask a advocate free from Lahore lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes