Find a Lawyer

SHAMIM AHMED KAZMI versus PRESIDING OFFICER, IVTH SINDH LABOUR COURT, KARACH

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O1 ~ (4) Withdrawal from employment After inquiry into the matter, the nature of the employees was dismissed. He took extra money as a Traffic Assistant (PIA) to receive extra goods from a foreign passenger. The case against the employee was not a misidentification because the employee admitted that there was a case with the foreign passenger. Had a surplus of goods and had to pay the same price as it could. The dollar or pound version, such as local currency or acceptable foreign currency, was $ 400, but the payment of Rs 8,300 in Pakistani currency from the recovery showed that domestic inquiry was quite different from a criminal case. This is where the basic principle was that if there were a hundred suspects, they could be detained if they had any benefit of the doubt, but in an innocent domestic inquiry, no one should harm the scales to protect their good wishes and credibility. An establishment, commercial or industrial, had to provide satisfaction to those dealing with it, and with unanticipated or scarred The designation of his position could not be tolerated simply by annulment of the establishment that no finger was being raised against him or his employees, dismissal of the employee, free of any defaulters or authority of any kind. The dismissal order was used to verify the appeal online advocate from Dunyapur lawyer