DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR versus MUHAMMAD HANIF
The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 section O12 (3) was revoked, along with the restoration of the job, which had been terminated by the employer in the current vacancy, by the Carpenter cold employee. The employer had no record available for The appointment of the employee was temporary, while it has been fully established that the employees were permanently deployed against the existing vacancies, did not immediately terminate the employees for any particular reason. So the order of suspension, therefore, cannot be sustained, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
