ZUBAIR AHMED KHAN AFGHANI versus MIDDLE EAST BANK LIMITED, KARACHI
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) was filed by the employer against the employee's application for his dismissal, stating that the employee was not an employee, the employee claimed. He was busy performing the duties of a scholar of nature. As a Grade II officer in the Export Department of the bank, no employee had any supervisory function, along with the letters issued by foreign banks as well as the relevant rules of the State Bank which the employees had to attend. In addition to the obligatory duties that were required to be signed by the employer bank, negotiating foreign bills, the employee himself confessed that the bill, exchange, form F, bill of lading and so on. Signing and verifying many of the documents, the duties of the employees, under the circumstances, were not Maulvi's but the caretaker's Yes, the nature of the job and the prediction of the job and the performance of an employee were considered and nothing to be done in relation to the work or incidental matters to prove whether they were filed by the employees. Complaint complaint request is not implemented.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Badin lawyer