Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, KARACHI versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25A Labor Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), Section 2 (n) Factories Act (XXV of 1934), Section 2 (h) Workman Petitioner, who was originally Assistant to the Inspector. Was subsequently promoted as Inspector Grade III and was currently serving as PWI in the Pakistan Railways as Perry WI. Not falling into one of the Factories Act, 1934, Section 2 (h) or Schedule II of the Workman's Compensation Act, 1923, was a civil servant and not an employee; treatment against such termination of service did not lie. Was. Before the Labor Court, even if it is assumed that the applicant is not a civil servant, he is looking at the nature of his duties, which was in every way a guardian, before the applicant seeks treatment. Labor court won't be official

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Tando Jam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.