Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus PUNJAB SEED CORPORATION

Sections 15, 22A (8) (G) and 25, A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) (B) and (C) of the Dispensary Disposal Procedure Employee. The startup was facing disciplinary action against the employee for committing theft and it was based on fact and was understandable in all respects and no charge was made against the employee in response to the charge sheet. Could not specify my status as The full defense opportunity was provided and he appeared before the inquiry committee, which provided him with the full opportunity to examine the prosecution's witnesses and to present the defense evidence in retaliation. The inquiry was finalized and the employee was convicted. Gone, but no final order was passed if any action was taken against the employee, in Labor Court, under section 25A of the Ordinance, which could have been a fair and self-sufficient remedy even if the charge against the employee was Whether it was right or not, the matter has to be decided by the relevant law itself and if it is If the allegations are proved, he can hardly challenge that he is doing illegal labor, practicing on behalf of the employer. criminal advocate from Upper Dir lawyer