Find a Lawyer

FAQIR MUHAMMAD versus DIRECTOR ACCOUNTS, AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD, MULTAN

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (g) The jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission to exercise jurisdiction over the Commission was based on an initial issue of unfair labor, such jurisdiction under section 15 of the jurisdiction. The scope was limited to matters that came up. In the case of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 and beyond, for any reason other than trade union activities, the Commission shall have no jurisdiction to indicate that nothing was available to the applicant. In the sense of the pass CL (C) was discriminated against in relation to employment. Section 15 of the Ordinance applicant did not mention any trade union activity in its application, which should be construed on the basis of an unfair labor practice claim and the alleged unfair labor practice along with the alleged arrest. Suspicion was not specified by the applicant. A (8) (g) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, was sufficiently justified to exclude a request from the Chairman of the Commission that no matter of unfair practice had been made and rightly found that The Commission has no jurisdiction in this matter; the reasonable order passed by the Chairman cannot be interfered with. famous high court advocate from Lalshanra lawyer