EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KHAIRPUR TUBEWELL DIVISION, KHAIRPUR versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 1 (3) (b) and a tube well watchman was appointed on a temporary basis in the Irrigation Department of Irrigation Department to maintain the care of 25 employees, suspended at any time without giving any reason. can go. His employment was that his services were to be operated under the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973 and the employees were terminated under the rules and regulations, he filed a complaint under section 25A of the ordinance. The complaint was opposed by the employer on the basis that the employees could be considered as employees in the State Administration and they were government employees and not employees and the complaint filed by them. Complaints were withheld under the provisions of the Sindh Civil Servants Act, 1973, nor were employees found in any manufacturing process. They were not falling under the Factory Act, 1934, nor in the category of persons who fall under the Workers' Compensation Act, 1923, under the definition of employees. Could not submit the petition, but their case was to be decided by the Sindh Service Tribunal Labor Court. Acceptance of Employee Complaint Request
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
