Sections 10 (4) and 11 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 337H (2), 337L (2) and 458 of the bill are responsible for coercion, forcing a woman to abduct, abduct or marry. Forces, maliciously or recklessly, causing injury, panicking at home or breaking into homes at night. Definition of evidence The benefit of the doubt was presented in the current trial in the Anti-Terrorism Court, and all the prosecution witnesses, including the complainant, the victim and the injured witness. , Apologizing to all the suspects, stating that the unidentified accused had searched their faces. And the accused was not present in the court, who attacked the complaining party, kidnapped the alleged kidnapper, and subjected him to Zina Bill repression, after making his first statement in the Anti-Terrorism Court. Had tried some cases and filed an anti-terrorism court to make another statement and gave different versions, reasons for contradictory statements made by the victim to the court, during his second statement filed by the same court. Threats were extended by the party Validity Victim, to abduct and subdue the accused. The allegations. Forced adultery to the father, the complainant himself appeared a second time and again forgave the accused, two versions of the prosecution's testimony, contradicting themselves. And two contradictory statements about the same incident, which cannot be considered true, raised real suspicion about the prosecution's testimony, which was hot and cold in one breath. And showed the least respect for speaking the truth, changing your version
