Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD versus ABDUL HAMEED

In the Colonization Act 1912 Sections 10 and 30 (2) of the Government Land (Punjab) the cancellation of the land was allotted under the Cooperative Farming Scheme. The nominee of the candidate was qualified after the payment of all the liabilities to the tenant and the nominee was decided by the conveyance in favor of such nominee of the original Aloty and long after his execution. Not long after, it was filed by the petitioner to cancel, stating that the designated suspect Or alatty who actually has much more clever and resourceful individual, was the name of Bhagat and was allotted land was in dispute with the Revenue and cooperative with the authorities and the adaptation of Bhagat told in his favor. The case record does not indicate that there was fraud or misrepresentation at any stage. The evidence on the record had fully proved that the original Altiz had properly nominated the nominee, his legal heir of the suit land case was executed by many authorities and courts and challenged the nominee. 15 years after the death of a competent qualification and convention deadline, a document was issued in favor of the nominee, who not only landed in the area, but was also a relative of the nominee and the original alteadi. , Has remained silent for almost 24 years, when the Transaction in favor of the designated Board of Revenue under section 30 (2) Option, if it turns out that a fraud or misrepresentation was made immigration advocates phone number from Sehwan lawyer