Find a Lawyer

ABDUL LATIF versus NAJAF HUSSAIN SHAH

The defendants challenged the request for retention of automobile amendments sections 42 and 164 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, which were filed after a period of 90 days, which the defendant accused. That the Revenue had approved the change in the dispute. Under the influence of the service of the Senior Army Officer, the officers who used their official designation, the Revenue Officers had to do as per the property of the Board of Applicants. Revenue was authorized to call its Motion Record at any time under Section 164 of the Act 1967. The issue of pending or settling matters before any tax is subordinated, although the limit set on the review request submitted to the Board was 90 days, but in the particular case in which the Revenue Officers through the applicant If allegations of illicit influence have been made, supervise the Revenue Officers in the case has become quite relevant and the Board should ensure that the applicant does not cause any injury or injustice to the Board. It was responsible to the Board of Revenue, whether the entire process was implemented in accordance with the law To review the operations of its subsidiaries under alleged circumstances. best advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer