Find a Lawyer

CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR OF AUQAF versus MUNAWAR HUSSAIN

West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act 1957 Section 8 West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance (VI VI 1960), Section 10 Observer to the Dedicated Property Stability Department Objection, had taken the shrine along with it in the dispute. One of the most valuable areas of stability was also included. Operations, the shrine area, which was extremely valuable and worth millions of rupees, was exchanged by respondents from the land of respondents, which was quite inferior and a few thousand rupees in respect of the price was reported by the Board of Revenue to the Consolidation Authority. There should be a dedicated land despite the guidance. Stopped by the stabilization operations, neither the consent of the Department nor the consent of the Department was approved, nor was the Chief of Administrator Akov granted the NOC in this regard to the respondents. Clearly the breaks were planned to achieve valuable land. The letter of the Administrator's letter to the Consolidation Authority in return for its inferior land was simply suggested to protect the interests of the Department and was in no way ordered by the members at the time of the order to transfer the land to the Department. , The consent of the Department for the transfer of the Board of Revenue cannot be considered. In the respondents' inferior ground, not properly appreciating the letter of the Administrator's punctuation in its correct case, the patent's error as a result of such action by the Member, Board of Revenue justifies its order revision ? jobs for advocates from Madinah lawyer