Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

Government Land (Colony) Act 1912 Sections 7 And 19 Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI Of 1887), Sections 4 (6) And (8) West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII Of 1967), Sections 4 (12) And 164 Landlords Taiwanese challenger Levy challenged land allotment in dispute when village dignitaries filed a petition against the applicant claiming that he was in illicit cultivation of the state land that was allotted to him by the Mavens authorities. Accepted the application and applied the applicant heavily to the applicant. Tawan alleged that he was not involved in the illegal cultivation of land in the dispute, but had been a farmer / planter in the measles for years, according to the land in the cultivation column, in the name of the respondents. / Allotment by the Applicants, who proved that the applicants were allotted land in violation of Section 19 of the Act, 1912 and such applicants entered the lane. d remained in dispute and cultivated it under the authority granted by the allottee to whom the land is legally allotted respondents / allottee, did not challenge such entries anywhere in the revenue record, thus It did not rule out landlord and tenant relationships between the parties in this matter. The parties cannot be called a sinner between the applicant and thus cannot be called involved in the illegal cultivation of the state land. The order of the petitioner should be reviewed by the accused for illegal cultivation of land in the dispute. I was set aside. list of supreme court advocates from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer