Find a Lawyer

SAJJAD ALI KHAN versus EJAZ HUSSAIN

The endorsement of the holding of the West Pakistan Stability Holding Ordinance, sections 10 and 13 of the 1960 Act (X of 1873), section 8, was solely decided by the appellant authority's special oath administration, by the respondents' father, It has been concluded that the defendants occupy the land in dispute. The respondents who took the oath from the Quran were not parties to the proceedings, nor were they the respondents' lawyers, and the oath was never accepted or approved by the applicants, or all of them. Something was done on their backs, according to the rules in judicial affairs, separately, concluding, the assessment or the acquisition of the results, must be based on valid evidence under the rules, which was supported by the relevant documents. The Divine Book of Prophecy, though not exclusively provided, is subject to such procedure by both parties. Pledged to take the oath was accepted or accepted by the other party, to the Appellate Court did not justify its conclusion regarding the possession of the defendants disputed land on oath. best advocate from Nowshera lawyer