Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus STATE

Government Land (Colony) Act 1912 Sections 32 and 34 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVI1 of 1967), Section 164 withdrew from the State Land Applicants who had forcibly entered and seized the encroachment in the dispute for the Dera Dera. Was safe or for the public. The opportunity to listen to revenue records showed that Ahata was specific to the Dera in the dispute and that its status and category had not changed in such a way that it could not be used individually for residential purposes. The Revenue Authority had to record the statements of the residents of the respective villages after the necessary publicity, converting the Ihatas for public purpose to another purpose, without changing this category, as the best judges of such Ihatas use themselves. Were on, should not be the type of Ihatas. Change because in a timely manner, more schools, dispensaries and community percentage increases in population would require orders to expedite removal of applicants in conflict, which the authorities correctly approved and did not challenge in review. can go. best advocate from Astore lawyer