Section 7 337A (iii) The Benefit of Doubt Due to the Shuja and Defendant's Testimony Testimony The eyewitness involved in the FIR did not support the case of the prosecution, and was declared ad hoc and the prosecution's other witness confessed. What he didn't see was the rocking. The complainant, nor did he see the complainant in the injured state, the other witness of the prosecutor who was the complainant's original brother, had improved his statement before the court and his statement was contradictory. The only argument was the doctor's statement, but it could not be relied upon. For reasons that contradict the contents of the FIR in their statement. The doctor also admitted that the Medico Legal report had no doctor's opinion. That he had a record of a radiologist. And the medical superintendent was not tolerated in any way by the Medical Superintendent in this Medo Legal report, alleging that it could not be prosecuted on specific evidence that it was not informed by Section 342. Went on to announce the CCPC's two key witnesses, the declaration as material contradictions and the complainant's real brother's statement, the non-countered Medico legal report by the complainant, and ultimately the medical Fatal error rather than relinquishment on the question of evidence, casting serious doubt on merits acceptance on the prosecution's case. The appeal was put aside by an unclean decision. The accused was acquitted of the charges, and was released on condition
