On the basis of Sections 561A, 107 and 151 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the distribution of the section 11 EE controversial leaflet order, the police in charge of the petition requested the relevant magistrate to restrain the applicants, on this basis. ? It is to be noted that he was previously convicted of distributing controversial leaflets in society. And second, that the two applicants, through their speeches, were going to destroy public peace and the peace of the area, the applicants were banned under Section 107/151, CRPC, under an unknown order under the magistrate, which Section 11EE of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 was read and ordered to be implemented. On the same day and date, the Validity Magistrate did not follow the procedure laid down under Sections 107 and 112 of personal interest of Rs 500,000; What. Within three years, the requirement of natural justice was that no one should be heard, but this condition was not met. The magistrate was legally obliged to refer the matter to the relevant session judge, as he himself was fined a person's freedom and There was no jurisdiction to take advantage of this. For a crime, if within its jurisdiction, there was a power abortion of justice provided under Section 11E of the Magistrate. The E-Counter Terrorism Act, 1997 was specifically bound by the DPO / SP. But the provision of this law does not authorize SDM to strictly prohibit any person on the basis of a simple charge imposed by a low level police officer magistrate.
