Section 302 (b) Testimony of Qatil-Umid evidence The benefit of the doubt was that the two eyewitnesses, who were examined twice during the investigation, had illegally improved their statements; Didn't inspect where to stay. Also, the site plan was prepared by the Assistant Sub Inspector of Police with the recollection notes, but the name of this important witness did not even appear in the witnesses' calendar, saying the key recovery note and the report / site plan, any witnesses Were illegally exhibited by , Who in the trial court who made false and unlawful indications of false documents cannot be relied upon, as the effect of the recovery was received six days after the arrest of the accused, Was not sent to. The Franzac Laboratory, which made the prosecution case suspicious, was assisted by all firearm recoveries. The recovery witness, who was the real nephew of the deceased, could not be thrown aside, in which he stated that all the recoveries were against the fact at one time and one house and according to the records of this case, Witnesses, the victims were ambushed three times, but the file of the case did not share the fact, but the mock and so-called site plan was silent on whether the bodies were not for post-mortem. Sent, excluding reason. All witnesses to the death, a common prosecutor, were interested should they take advantage of the doubt arising from the circumstances, they should go to the accused, for which
