Sections 324, 337 D&34 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (c) and 19 (12) of Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) Qatal-Um, Jaffa, Joint Intent, Terrorism An act of defining unlicensed evidence, the reason for the incident is that the alleged identity of the accused was not delayed in the FIR, which was otherwise valid, not fatal. I had long been a witness to the eyewitnesses. Cross-examined, but nothing was found to break the truth of their statements, but rather to examine the accused. Along with the eyewitness testimony of the incident not only established the presence of the complainant but also the presence of the accused scene, the presence of the injured person along with the witness and the witness was established outside the shadow of the accused. The irrevocable, irrevocable and trustworthy statement of any witness was sufficient to deliver the accused's guilty home, with no evidence that minor contradictions, such as in the case, should not go the way of the prosecution, the trial court's ruling / ruling In the absence of any deficiency, I was retained to the extent of the accused and his appeal was dismissed; the decision of the trial judge / order declaring the guilty plea was accepted. Was removed under section 19 (12) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997
