Gilgit Baltistan — Judgments of 2014

11 reported judgments of the Gilgit Baltistan from 2014.

  • The STATE v. RIAZ 2014 PCrLJ 721

    Section 302 (b) Testimony of Qatil-Umid evidence The benefit of the doubt was that the two eyewitnesses, who were examined twice during the investigation, had illegally improved their statements; Didn…

  • MAQBOOL HUSSAIN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 923

    Sections 324, 337 D&34 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (c) and 19 (12) of Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) Qatal-Um, Jaffa, Joint Intent, Terrorism An act of definin…

  • MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. State 2014 PCrLJ 943

    Section 302/34 Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX 1965), Section 13 Murder, Joint Intent, Definition of Proof of Unlicensed Weapons: Evidence of prosecution was presented on the foregoing enmity between the …

  • Syed NAWAZ HUSSAIN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1256

    Section 153 is an anti-terror act (XXVII of 1997), sections 8 and 9 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898); ? The susceptibility of the offense under Section 153A, PPC and Section 8/9 of the Anti-Te…

  • RAHAT SHAH v. State 2014 MLD 1286

    Section 7 337A (iii) The Benefit of Doubt Due to the Shuja and Defendant's Testimony Testimony The eyewitness involved in the FIR did not support the case of the prosecution, and was declared ad hoc a…

  • MUHAMMAD SHAFFA v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1301

    Definition of Section 2 (b (b)) delay in filing the FIR, which may affect the merits of this case, nor any post-mortem report is on record to prove the FIR lodger's dispute. Neither the arm nor the em…

  • Maulvi ALI MUHAMMAD HADI v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1349

    On the basis of Sections 561A, 107 and 151 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), the distribution of the section 11 EE controversial leaflet order, the police in charge of the petition requested …

  • NASRULLAH v. State 2014 MLD 1500

    Section 497 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Manufacturing Arts 3 and 4, Ownership with or possessing intoxicants, Explanation of Articles 3 and 4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Orde…

  • AMJAD WALI v. State 2014 YLR 1503

    Sections 302 (b), 34, 109 and 212 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a), 21 L & 21 J Qtal Am, Joint Intent, Advertising, Asylum Criminals, Terror Action Defining the evidence of the…

  • MUDASIR IMAM v. State 2014 YLR 1850

    Section 497 (2) of the Contempt of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 34 of Coultam, joint intent to guarantee, further investigation grants were neither attributed to any overt act suspect, nor …

  • MURSALEEN v. State 2014 YLR 1868

    An attempt to impose sanctions after section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 324, resulted in injury to the injured leg as a result of further investigation attributed to the accuse…

Other years — Gilgit Baltistan

2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.