Article 199 The appointment of the Director of the Constitution Public Joint Venture Petitioner was made a director of the company under a notification, for three years, however, before the expiry of his term, his appointment was made through another notification. The cancellation was made, and the said defendant appointed in his place argued that his appointment could not be terminated suddenly without giving any reason. The valid fact of the record was that the applicant, through a notification, was appointed for a period of three years and could not cancel his appointment without giving any reason, proper investigation of the alleged complaint against the applicant. Was required because serious allegations were made against the applicant and no immediate action could be taken against the applicant without giving him the opportunity to present his defense, not to mention anything about the complaint received against the petitioner. Tuner and, therefore, the removal of the applicant through a joint venture agreement (Pakistan) Between China and China) cannot be legally justified. It has been revealed that the appointment of directors will be made with the mutual consent of the parties, so if the applicant was to change. By someone else in Pakistan, this person could only be appointed for the rest of the applicant's time, therefore, the unwanted notification of such score was also illegal, keeping the disqualified notification aside. Permission was granted, accordingly \ r \ n
