Find a Lawyer

SARA NOOR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 5, Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition The suit to dissolve the marriage on the basis of the wife's statement that she was ready to leave her Dover on the basis of the scope of the dispute was gold. The jewelry was seized by the wife, alleging that the gold jewelry was in the custody of the husband while he denied that such a contentious issue could not be resolved without creating opportunity for both parties. Is. To add to their evidence, however, the decree of dissolution of the marriage on the basis of khola cannot be annulled and will remain the proper way. The matter with regard to gold jewelry is to be settled and so on. Decide the case accordingly. And the trial court was directed to settle the matter and proceed with the case in accordance with the law of the Constitution Petty.

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2014

• REHAN ALI v. MINISTRY OF TECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL 2014 CLC 503
• Syed SHABI HASSAN v. GUARDIAN JUDGE, WEST ISLAMABAD 2014 CLC 510
• MEGA SIGN v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2014 CLC 516
• REHAN ALI v. MINISTRY OF TECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL 2014 PLC(CS) 516
• JAVED MAHMOOD v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLC(CS) 562
• MINISTRY OF INTER PROVINCIAL COORDINATION v. Major (R) AHMAD NADEEM SADAL 2014 CLC 600
• Miss ZAKIA NAURIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLC(CS) 609
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONCOMPANY LIMITED v. PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY 2014 CLD 610

All Islamabad judgments of 2014 →

law websites from Bolan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes