Arts 199 and 18 Constitutional application without open auction Site allotment, Allotment and re-allotment through open auction, Applicants' rule was that the sites were allotted to them for a period of five years and the advertisement was non-auctioned. Legal, arbitrary and in violation of their fundamental rights, the legitimate license in question paid favor to the applicants, but it was originally from the state and state, and its powers were exercised by the public liability. Officials had a duty to protect and protect it. To ensure maximum transparency and maximum benefit to the state exchequer, whenever there is a right of the state to be excluded, equal opportunities should be extended to all potential aspirants who intend to acquire state property. Are sure to demand. The basic exercise of public notice was not applied by the maximum participation authority, which gave the entire practice excessive licenses, the applicants were approved without a competitive process. Could not claim to be entitled to continue. Article 18 of the Constitution was violated because the applicants were not invited other than the bidder and action was taken on the board against all the licenses which were issued without discrimination and discrimination. The question of behavior was not born. Revert to illegal order In the present case the principle of lux punity was not applicable, under constitutional jurisdiction.
