Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONCOMPANY LIMITED versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY

Complaint companies filed a complaint with Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) in connection with Section 4 (M) Broadband services, alleging that Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) had made it public. Offer them broadband services for the next sale, but at the same time provide the same services to the general public. That PTCL provided broadband services to the public at very low rates and placed the complaining companies in a position where they could not provide the same services at the same rate. Agreed to evaluate whether it is actually providing. Broadband services to the public against the prices of the complaining companies PTA resolved the complaints after the consent of both parties and directed the PTCL to submit its audit accounts. The PTCL filed an existing appeal against the PTA eligibility order. In addition, the PTA requested the PTCL record only to decide whether there was fair competition in the market or if no final order was passed by the PTA. , So the current appeal was ineligible for such a score, so the appeal was dismissed. Accordingly

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2014

• SARA NOOR v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2014 CLC 528
• JAVED MAHMOOD v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLC(CS) 562
• MINISTRY OF INTER PROVINCIAL COORDINATION v. Major (R) AHMAD NADEEM SADAL 2014 CLC 600
• Miss ZAKIA NAURIN v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLC(CS) 609
• The FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN v. General (R) PERVEZ MUSHARRAF 2014 PCrLJ 684
• MUHAMMAD TARIQ MALIK v. PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division 2014 PLC(CS) 685
• SOHAIL NAJEEB v. MINISTRY OF FINANCE 2014 PLC(CS) 750
• WARID TELECOM (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PTD 752

All Islamabad judgments of 2014 →

inheritance advocates near Rawalpindi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes