Sections 302 (c), 316, 148 and 149 of the murder, the murder of Shabab and Umd, the accused could not be denied the presence of the accused on the spot, as he himself was injured. The injured were also injured. They had been stabbed at each other, but it could not be proven on the record that the accused had hurt the deceased with a hatchet, even as witnesses' statements were denied by medical evidence, raising doubts. Whether or not it really happened. Whether or not the accused has been described by the prosecution, the accused's colleagues also suffered injuries, while only one woman received injuries from the other side, the fact is who was the assailant, and who was attacked. There was one case, which may not have been proved, no blood was recovered from any place or sticks were recovered from the place. The specific character of the accused, the trial court, had properly sentenced him, but the conviction of the accused was not correct under Section 161616, PPC, which is why it was said that this section was related to the murder case. , Was not applicable because this record showed that it was a free fight, and in the absence of the recovery of any weapon, it cannot be said that the crime was performed before the crime, in the circumstances, under section 2302 ( C), shall be punished under PPC and not under Section 161616, the PPC was substituted for the offense of the accused and sentenced under section 2302 (c). Which of the accused has been sentenced? Was appropriate and appropriate, by the trial court, under which section 382B was taken advantage of, the CCPC which
