Sections 4, 6 and 21 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 42, appeal to the Supreme Court suit for pre-emptive right. Fifth, the submission of the scope trial court directed the plaintiff to submit a fifth of the probable consideration. The plaintiff petitioned for permission to present the surety bond instead of the cash deposit, which was rejected simultaneously. The plaintiff's argument was that the trial court had the authority to deposit the cash. Change the order on the submission of cash from security. The claimant is obliged to order a security deposit, whether it is equal to one-fifth of the probable value of the land or will require the court to be satisfied that it does not exceed the probable value of the property. The trial court did not have jurisdiction to submit cash or order any other security after the trial. Had asked for equity for himself then he would have to take equity in favor of the other party. Wendy purchased the suit against a cost of $ 5 million and because of filing a pre-emption suit, a large amount of money would remain in the case until the plaintiff's case was settled. The amount that is credited to prove your dignity by working with equality is available to pay the costs and if the defendant fails to deposit or present the security amount at the time appointed by the court, Should be rejected or appeal dismissed. The following courts had legally approved the invisible orders, in any of the decisions passed by the High Court plaintiff.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2015
