TANVIR AHMED CHOUDHARY versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Section 19 Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Rules, 2002, R23 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), limitation of appeal of the Supreme Court written application for the issuance of licenses for Section 42 radio channels, and Effective Remedy Scope Petitioner Company requested the Department of Interior to issue a license to operate a radio channel, but was advised to consult the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority for similar respondents in which Pakistan Electronic Media Any order passed by the officer of the Regulatory Authority was a hearing ? Prior to the dismissal of the writ petition by the High Court, a person aggrieved by an order approved by the officer of the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority may file an appeal within thirty days of the issuance of the order but the inappropriate order shall be sent to the applicant on time. Was sent within but failed to file an appeal against T. He said that the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Rules 2002 was an effective method of procurement through R23 and that the written application was available for alternative and effective treatment. I did not apply but filed a writ petition for every alternative remedy There was no restriction, but when the alternative was so effective then the writ petition was not applicable. Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority has not yet made a decision. The request for the issuance of licenses for the radio channel is General Manager (Licensing) Pakistan Electronic. The media was placed before the Regulatory Authority which requested the applicant company to apply. Appeal of the law
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2015
