Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus KHADIM HUSSAIN

Seventh-twelfth, RQ law in the testimony (of 1984 of the ten), civil petition for leave to appeal under Article Civil 87 application, at least four copies of leave to petitioner for leave to appeal. Would like to submit and will be appealed as well. Appeal or application was declared compulsory before the provisions of R3 of the Supreme Court Rules 1978 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court. Will be done Azad Jammu and Kashmir could not be treated as a copy under OO XII, R3 of 1978, an application for leave to appeal was ineligible which was rejected in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2015

• Mst. SHAZIA KOUSAR v. NISAR AHMED 2015 YLR 917
• MEHARBAN HUSSAIN v. ZAHIDA KAUSAR 2015 MLD 955
• ABDUL RASHID ABBASI v. JAMIL AHMED MALIK 2015 YLR 1187
• GHULAM ASGHAR v. SARWAR BEGUM 2015 CLC 1406
• MUHAMMAD NAZIM v. MUNEER AKHTAR 2015 YLR 1433
• TANVIR AHMED CHOUDHARY v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2015 YLR 1728
• MUHAMMAD MALIK v. MANZOOR HUSSAIN 2015 YLR 1923
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. MUHAMMAD ZAMAN 2015 PLD 1

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2015 →

power of attorney advocate Shangla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes