Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ASGHAR versus SARWAR BEGUM

Article 42 (??) (d) Citizens appeal related to the Supreme Court will lie with the appeal of the Supreme Court, the decision of the High Court, the order, the final order or sentence if the amount or value of the dispute subject to the appeal is not reduced. Thousands of rupees and the High Court had fixed the decision of the court or final order in the trial court immediately after hearing the trial case. In the present case, an order of Rs. 3 lakh was passed in which 3 lakh. The amount was Rs. The High Court amended the order and fixed a price instead of Rs. 3 lakh as the High Court declared the decree as diversified and Direct appeal had been out period shall lie to the Supreme Court to ban the term from six months to file an application for leave to appeal application has been sent to treat the request for appeal request

Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2015

• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. AHMED DIN 2015 MLD 864
• Mst. SHAZIA KOUSAR v. NISAR AHMED 2015 YLR 917
• MEHARBAN HUSSAIN v. ZAHIDA KAUSAR 2015 MLD 955
• ABDUL RASHID ABBASI v. JAMIL AHMED MALIK 2015 YLR 1187
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. KHADIM HUSSAIN 2015 MLD 1412
• MUHAMMAD NAZIM v. MUNEER AKHTAR 2015 YLR 1433
• TANVIR AHMED CHOUDHARY v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2015 YLR 1728
• MUHAMMAD MALIK v. MANZOOR HUSSAIN 2015 YLR 1923

All Supreme Court Azad Kashmir judgments of 2015 →

lawer from fb area from Rabwah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes