Section 5, Schedule Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Article 42 The Supreme Court had upheld the husband's claim that the case for dissolution of the marriage was filed on the basis that it was not on a sincere basis, Was impotent and no law could force a wife to stay with her husband when he said that at all costs she wanted separation and she was not happy. Spouses living with their husbands should separate if it was impossible for them to live together within the limits prescribed by Allaah, although the basic premise of abolishing the marriage contract was that the husband was unmarried. It can be argued that she does not live with her husband as such, in such cases it would be extremely difficult to talk about whether the husband was powerful or the imperfect marriage may dissolve on the basis that the court is satisfied that the spouse is appointed by Allah. Can't live as a husband and wife within the boundaries and it is not necessary that she be trained only on the basis of khula Can be. The following courts participated legally in the dispute and, while giving concrete reasons, passed the controversial decisions, no illegal or irregularities were identified in the illegal decision.
Related judgments — Supreme Court Azad Kashmir, 2015
