Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Respondent for restoration of immunity from service was excluded from the Appellant for certain corruption proceedings for which he was found guilty in a domestic inquiry. Was restored because the alleged respondent was left absent knowingly respondents denied their signature upon receipt of the letter, which the appellant stated that the registered post respondent had sent to the respondent That he had sent a letter to the Inquiry Officer asking him for the purpose of cross examination Provide copies of witness statements, but the Inquiry Officer has been denied any letter that expresses serious doubts about the Inquiry Officer's neutrality and the circumstances indicate that the Inquiry Officer Conduct was not prosecuted on the basis of such inquiry report so the respondent's order of reinstatement was not upheld, and he was charged with felony charges, resulting in such inquiry. It is up to the appellant to conduct a fresh investigation and to decide on the arrears They had been kept open.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
