Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR HAIDER versus PAKISTAN STEEL, KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (1) and Section O12 (3) Service to Appellant Workers for Years in Service of Respondent Mills But he wasn't. Appellants Applying for Permanent Workers Appellants filed a complaint before the Labor Court asking them to be treated as permanent workers and granted concessions that are acceptable to permanent workers. Was dismissed and their claim was to act like permanent workers. Not accepted and subsequently their services were terminated by appellants working for the last 3/4 years against permanent work, they got permanent employees status, the employer ordered to terminate any job. Which was to be issued under the mandatory provision of the law, the appellants working for the defendants, without long term proof of breaking them without any legal evidence, would bring them into permanent employee appreciation and temporary employees. Or their services as daily wage laborers could not be terminated. No clear reason for the dismissal was given and the employees were reinstated as permanent employees and concessions are allowed. Associated with a permanent worker criminal advocate from Parachinar lawyer