MANZOOR A. YOUSUFANI versus REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, SINDH
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 8 (7) and 25A Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R 11 provided no provision for exemption appeal or application where the registrar, trade union amended or changed. Section 8 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, also does not enforce the Constitution of Association Subsection (7) where the change of office was not denied by the Registrar, in the case of a change of office In this case, the Labor Court may, under this section, say that, for reasons of registration in writing, the Registrar Asks for fresh elections supervised merchandise. The question is whether there has been a dispute regarding the change of office bearers or were there reasons why a Labor Court order to order fresh elections can only be decided. After the evidence was filed, the Labor Court did not have the authority to order the registry under section 8, section (7) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, although it did not affect the amendment / amendment of the constitution. The truth was that if they were satisfied that a change of office was in dispute and the latest elections were to take place, this could result in a Labor Court. Only after recording such evidence was the application rejected under Order VII, R 11, the CPC retained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
