MUHAMMAD JASEEM versus PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION, KARACHI
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A Applicants from the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (4) service were charged with forgery of certain documents. Bills have declined in steel mills since. Appellant was dismissed after the inquiry officer submitted his report against him in the Domestic Inquiry, dismissing the appellant's complaint request by Labor Court record stating that the Inquiry Officer had sent the applicants original documents. / Was convicted without contesting the gate passes, which was allegedly based. In the record of the inquiry without corroborating the corruption proceedings and self-documentation, it is not stated that the inquiry officer provided the appellant with the opportunity to examine the respondent's testimony, which was in fact the only witness who Also asked questions to the refusal officer and cross-examined. Appellant at length and based on his answers to such an examination, even when the complainant in writing said that he did not want to inspect the appeals, such an inquiry was made in Standing Order 15 (4). ) That cannot be considered free or impartial, and any order passed after such inquiry. The report was not lasting, and the order of the Labor Court was set aside and the appellant was restored to employment with back benefits because the allegations against the appellants were serious and the technical dismissal order was set aside. New to the administration against them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
