Find a Lawyer

RECKITT & COLMAN PHARMACEUTICAL (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI versus ASPRO NICHOLAS EMPLOYEES\' UNION

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 26 Despite the existence of a strike union settlement reached between the union and the employers according to which the union will not raise any disputes or demands during the settlement, raising fresh demands and giving notice which resulted in the strike union. Was. Earlier, negotiations did not attempt to resolve the dispute between the parties in terms of fresh demands; if allowed to go ahead and strike was allowed, employers would suffer irreparable harm, If further action was withheld from the notice given by the Union, under section 26 (1), the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, would not incur substantial injury or irreparable harm because the contract between the parties was 6 months. Was expiring, and after the settlement period ends, the union will have the right to raise fresh demands, including. Controversial demands raised by the union, including convenience, are in favor of employment but, through interim injunction, the prayer was sought by employers. famous supreme court advocate from Jehlum lawyer