MOULA BUX ALIAS NOUMAN versus GOVERNOR OF SINDH/CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF SINDH
Article 13 (1) [As amended by Sindh University Rules (Amendment) Act (XMLII of 2013]] Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 (1) (b) (ii), 48 and 105 Constitutional Appeal of High Court Judicial Appointment Jurisdiction against the position of Vice-Chancellor of the University whether the Vice-Chancellor has a personal right of the person acting or the matter of discrimination. Along with violating the principles, Article 105 - The Constitution of Sindh University Laws (Amendment) Act, 2013 introduced amendments, under which the Vice-Chancellor The terms of the ordinance were reduced to three consecutive terms twice; the applicant enjoyed two consecutive terms of the post of Vice-Chancellor and was appointed to the third term, which was amended by the Sindh University Act, 1972. Was settled on his behalf, the applicant believed that the appointment was made in his favor and that the matter of the meeting had taken the form of past and closed deals, with the former effect on the basis of the amendment. Cannot reopen. That the amendment included a provision of the act that the current Vice-Chancellor would cease to hold office, but in the case of another university, no such provision was included, so the applicant Could not be removed and he was entitled to fulfill his right. In terms of the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor, the philosophy of the third term or the position of past and closed transactions did not apply, but for the third term, they were claiming the Vice-Chancellor that a competent legislature made sure
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
