The accused was named as a gift on section 39, & 42 and document 54 for the cancellation of the document, the declaration and the injunction against the defendant's defendant in the trial and the request for unlawful influence. From time to time visiting Pakistan from time to time the plaintiff lived in the house of the defendant and his real brother was also living in the house of the defendant at the relevant time. In the absence of reliable and credible evidence, the High Court denied that. Gift from History to History (10 2 1992) 18 8 1999, the plaintiff's real brother did not inform her or was prevented from doing so by the defendant and her husband, forcibly and illegitimate influence. Was targeted so that he could pay a gift in favor of the plaintiff. Her husband did not produce a document, such as the plaintiff's passport or ticket to show that the plaintiff had arrived in Pakistan in 1999 when the suit filed by the plaintiff was withheld over time. The work was filed six years after registration, so, dismissing the suit as a circumstance was prohibited \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
