Sections 392, 406, 468, 471, 109, 193 and 34 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A), as a forgery, fraudulent document for the purpose of fraud, fraudulent documents. Useful, false evidence, appeals against the trial court against a joint intention observed all possible steps to secure the attendance of the prosecution witnesses, but despite these efforts, the prosecution failed to present the witness, The person who left the negative signal, either the prosecutor was suppressing material facts, or the witnesses were not supporting the prosecution in litigation against the trial court. It was justified as a defect in the prosecution's evidence; the trial had no other option but to pass a proper ruling and decide the case based on the evidence available on record. While admitting that the flats in the dispute were owned by his accused / wife, the complainant also admitted that his wife was hanged in the High on the basis of a power of attorney, in favor of her, he hanged her, The registered designated complainant in connection with the above mentioned flats had no evidence of the gold jewelry allegedly stolen from his office. And was living with the sons. The interior shows defamation in the sanctions of the accused and did not appeal that the victim of the robbery was living with the culprits in the same flat without resolving his complaint; civil litigation between the parties is pending. ? The High Court also ordered the unclean order to acquit the accused
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
