A VII, R 11 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 23 suit dealing with the claimant in connection with the property in connection with the plaintiff's dismissal by performing special acts What his son owned was the plaintiff's real owner. The plaintiff's agreement with the plaintiff was without the permission of the original owner, who never agreed to the contract and refused to execute the power of attorney in favor of the plaintiff. There was no confidentiality of the agreement between the plaintiff and the real owner. ? The plaintiff's property The plaintiff knew that the contract depended on the execution of the General Power of Attorney by the original owner who had no obligation to execute the power of attorney. Defendants did not have the option to contract a sale in connection with the property that did not belong. Therefore, under the agreement, the contract was not for a valid item in terms of section 23 of the Act, 1872, as it had suffered a similar injury to the property. The other person, the plaintiff, had no reason to take action. The plaintiff was dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
