Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus MUHAMMAD ARIF

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 (MLR 115), Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The sale of the plaintiff related to the two measles numbers and the pre-arrest referred to the plaintiff one. Was ordered from but the other was denied on the ground that both the tenant and the plaintiff / seller had filed appeals. Vendor's appeal was rejected when the plaintiff's review was accepted Wendy's review was accepted because of incorrect reading / not reading evidence. For questions on the finding of facts by the High Court and the misinformation and non-reading of the courts below, leave for appeal. The plaintiff could in fact not present a case for interference of the Supreme Court in aspects. The petitioner had also failed to produce a record of the contents of the application in violation of the Supreme Court rules, relying on the High Court when a vendor submitted a defense of superior rights. The Syed Kamal's case, which was found to be beneficial to the integration of Islam in PLD 1986 SC 360, will be subject to the condition that no decree can be passed in his favor for the first time after 31 July 1986. And in the case of Sardar Ali, the Supreme Court ruled that PLD 1988 SC 287 would not support such a dispute. The leave to appeal was denied in the circumstances. registration advocate from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer