Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SAJAWAL KHAN versus HUKAM DAD


Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Constitution of Pakistan Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Revision The theory of sinking in the Punjab suit for the Pre-Impression High Court, on the request of the rule of Cinder, against the vendor Wendy. A lawsuit was filed for premature removal. The plea was that the sinking rule did not apply to Punjab province, thus the High Court's decision in Maula Bakhsh's case was attributed to the Supreme Court, PLD 1989 SC 278 and the case of Mohammad Ismail. I was reported as a PLD. In 1989, SC 47T enacted the rule that the rule of sinkar is applicable in the Punjab High Court, therefore the appeal was refused when the decision of the case was taken on the request of the rule of sank danda.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Zhob lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.