Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SABIR versus FATIMA BIBI

The Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was also heard by the Appellate High Court before the trial, in the amendment, on the re-evaluation of the evidence, the dismissal cases. The hearing was excluded. A special plea was made by the plaintiff alleging that Wendy's testimony dismissed her claims. He stated in his evidence that the shopkeeper was contacted to buy the property belonging to the claimant, but he had shown his ineligibility as he had no money and the claimant was present. At the time of the execution of the sale agreement and he participated in the sale transaction, the plaintiff did not deny the facts which appeared as his own testimony The defendant also stated the statements of the defendant's witnesses The High Court had examined the evidence in record minutes and after the plaintiff's case identified the defect, the High Court correctly recorded the evidence on record by saying that the plaintiff knew the evidence. Hayes was brought on record but did not say that he was neither present nor offered to buy the land at the time of the deal. And the High Court did not refuse to buy such land due to non-availability of money. It is unimaginable to understand and the appeal was denied because there was no error in the law. advocates from Thul lawyer