Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus REHMAT ALI

Government Land (Punjab) 's Colonization Act of 1912 Section 19 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 573 Selecting a constituency of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff based on the dismissal agreement by the trial court Under His appeal was also upheld by the High Court, however, in the application for leave of appeal, the same petition was raised against the claimants of the claimant which the High Court had dealt with substantially, before the High Court on the basic validity of the agreement. There was no dispute about it. The real contention of the illicit sale of the plaintiffs and defendants, which was before the High Court and raised in the petition for leave to appeal again, is that the proprietary rights were not obtained at the time of the agreement in favor of the plaintiff. Were. Do not base civil proceedings either against the shopkeepers or against the defendants, as no sanction was obtained under section 19, the colonization of public lands. In a similar situation before the execution of the agreement in favor of the plaintiff, Act, 1912, the Supreme Court in Haji passed another law, the River Project (Prevention of Land Control and Speculation) Act 194. Was also solved. The case of Abdullah Khan has been reported as PLD 1965 SC 690, which banned strangers from the High Court, leaving unconstitutional leave to appeal. jobs for fresh advocates from Musafir Khana lawyer