DIN MUHAMMAD versus EIDU
Transfer Property Act 1882 Section 58 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The petitioner asserts that the defendant claimed ownership of the land in dispute on the basis of a mortgage with the conditional sale in his favor. , Which he accused of being a mortgage with a conditional sale in his favor. While the defendants interpreted this process as a simple mortgage case, otherwise, after considering evidence about the record and value of the land in the dispute, neither the appellate and review court witnesses supported the following. Has been, in turn, the recorded discoveries of reality. Respondent's agreement constituted fraud, thus proving that the fraud was based on appeal was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Chohar Jamali lawyer
