Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ versus AFSAR KHAN

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Fraud and Fraud Allegations Petitioner Woman with the impression that she was retained as the owner of the land in this case, despite Despite confirming the change in her favor, the respondents were based on fraud and cohabitation, and thus the trial of the unqualified applicant was dismissed by the court. The decision was upheld by the appellate court, but the appeal was overturned by the High Court in its review jurisdiction, which was against a fraudulent request for protection against a deposed woman. That he participated in this transaction. Apart from the factual aspect, the applicant's husband also accompanied her during the mutiny proceedings, which had not suffered any disability and marked some entries which had no explanation. And she appeared numerous times and still her interests were fully protected even if the questions were brought under scrutiny regarding her hankering woman, a bargain exchange, petitioner Accepting property obtained in return, accusing him of fraud in connection with the entire exchange. And he wasn't ready to give it up, so he wanted to avoid that part. The fact that the applicant was a victim of fraud could not be allowed for both benefits of the exchange transaction in which he had to separate with his property instead of the property held by the applicant. Or n famous supreme court advocate from Choppar Hatta lawyer