THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR versus AMIR REHMAN
Section 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 417 (2A), the benefit of the appellant's suspicion against arrest was filed on 13, 2011, while Sample 2 was sent to the forensic science laboratory. 7 2011 Delay in sending samples was not specified which prompted tampering with the same investigating officer and did not explain the interference between sending samples safely. And the prohibited methods and method of recovering the weight were dubious The trial court identified material contradictions in the statement of the prosecution's witnesses and irregularities, which created tension in the prosecution's case when two explanations were equally possible. Should be in favor of the accused. The benefit of the doubt to be admitted was rightly given to the accused, under the circumstances, the NGS of the Findy Trial Court did not result in inadequacy of mind, misreading and misinterpretation, misrepresentation, misuse of mind and evidence. Can be given and the motions and grounds for acquittal of the accused were recorded on the basis of accurate and consistent reviews and testimonials. The disclosure principles of criminal jurisprudence charged them with innocence after they were acquitted of criminal charges, and the courts obliged to review the matter as to whether the courts ignored any evidence or, therefore, exclude any evidence. Has not been recognized by the law. Appeal against Brett was dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
