PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. versus MUHAMMAD ALI
In the Section 42 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), the declaration date in the Article 120 suit is recorded in the birth record, the plaintiff's correction (Employee of Pakistan Steel Mills) alleged that its date was mistaken in the service record as 21 12 1951. Has been listed. In 1956, the plaintiff's employer requested that the case be banned from filing after joining the service for 30 years, indicating that the plaintiff's date of birth was 1956 as his old and new national identity card. I was mentioned, in which it was not challenged. The defendant's reliance on the plaintiff's notice that the defendant had not admitted in the handwriting of the plaintiff's witness that the plaintiff's date of birth in the medical card and insurance paper was 1956, according to the plaintiff as he had come. Know about such wrong entry in the service record, when he applied for a loan and was informed that he was going to retire in 2011, according to his date of birth. 1951, but the defendant refused to correct it in 2008. The defendant had failed to prove that the defendant knew of such registration in the service record prior to the year 2008. The defendant defended his employees' terms and conditions. No rules / regulations were put in place to control the rules, which prevented modification of them. Date of birth suit was decided in circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
