FAROOQUI ICE FACTORY, GAMBAT versus REVENUE OFFICER SEPCO (WAPDA), RANIPUR, DISTRICT KHAIRPUR
Section (4 ()) National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Tariff Standards and Procedures) Rules, 1998, Article 17 (1) and (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for the Adjustment of Fuel Prices from the previous months Charges in the previous recovered electricity bills are affecting the current or personal right to legal notification whether such notification can be given the foreseeable effect, as applicants, who run different types of businesses, are invited by Respondent Electric. They were badly affected by the fuel price adjustment charges imposed on electricity bills. Supply company applicants' fuel adjustment charges are being charged with disappointment. Applicants were required to pay a fuel adjustment charge in their current electricity bills from a previous month through a federal government-issued notification. That a notification cannot be undone. That a huge burden was being placed on the applicants, which was to deprive them of the fundamental right to run their business. The Weldetti Electric Supply Company had the legal authority to impose fuel price adjustment charges in accordance with the Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Section 31. The distribution of the Electric Power Act 1997 and Rr 17 (1) and (3) of the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Tariff Standards and Procedure) Rules 1998, however, does not constitute such power solely and only fairly and fairly to the Fuel Price Adjustment Charges. Had to use the existing constitutional principles. Regarding the previous months, the Regulation for Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act of 1997
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
